Cheshire Cat Computing

command line: BUILD command does not build at a specified location

PLAN : rotation only works if NO preceding comma CALL xyz 5,5,5,1 fails CALL xyz 5,5,5 1 succeeds

The BUILD command can sometimes be confusing, since the location given to BUILD corresponds to 0,0,0 in the called plan. Since this is usually the corner of the structure, you can get an apparent offset.

The way around this is to define a special 'wrapper' plan that simply calls the real plan at an offset (and possibly rotation) in such a way that the new structure is centered when it should be. An example of this is the cottage blueprint -- the '_cottage' plan is the actual cottage, but the 'cottage' plan makes an offset in such a way that 0,0,0 is right in front of you.

The syntax check on the CALL is being a bit pedantic in only accepting commas between the coordinates. This should be fixed in later versions of the module. THanks for pointing it out...

_________________
Steve Shipway
UNIX Systems, ITSS, University of Auckland, NZ
Woe unto them that rise up early in the morning... -- Isaiah 5:11

When generating models with /wand copy please move the placing of e.g. torches to the end of the plan otherwise it might try to place e.g. torches where there is no wall at the moment of placement and thus those torches won't attach and will just fall and float around to be picked up. Thanks.

This is a good point. Currently, the copy just runs side to side and copies directly. It would probably be more effective to do a two-pass copy; the first pass handling the stable blocks, and the second handling the decoration blocks (torches, trapdoors, plants, rails...). This would make a final Plan that is more likely to hold together; in fact I've done this manually in the various example plans, for this reason.

The current version of the mod only makes one pass for blocks, and a second pass for mobs (if the copymobs flag is set in the options). I'll look at fixing this for the next version.

_________________
Steve Shipway
UNIX Systems, ITSS, University of Auckland, NZ
Woe unto them that rise up early in the morning... -- Isaiah 5:11

The problem with sequence (mentioned above) is now fixed in 2.6beta1

_________________
Steve Shipway
UNIX Systems, ITSS, University of Auckland, NZ
Woe unto them that rise up early in the morning... -- Isaiah 5:11

Thanks. Haven't seen the link to download, have read the announcement though. The next would be a suggestion.
If it would be possible to directly generate the PRIVATE/PUBLIC classes where the PUBLIC class would always
just call the PRIVATE one. The reason is I can easily set the point from where to start the build and rotation in
the CALL command. I do it manualy at the moment for all blueprints since after copying it from world it's not
always clear from where and with what rotation the build starts. Sorry to bug you like this but I really like
your mod and use it a lot. Almost all the walls (my obsession) are built from a blueprint.
File comment: Walled village

walled_village.jpg [ 109.77 KiB | Viewed 8310 times ]

That build is looking nice! Are you able to post the Blueprint for the wall section to the blueprints forum?

So, if I understand, you want the 'copy' to generate

private plan _xxxx
....
end
public plan xxxx
call 0 0 0 0 _xxxx
end

instead of the current? Unfortuntely, this would be awkward, as copy/save is done for an individual plan rather than for a whole blueprint (where a 'blueprint' is a file containing multiple plans, of course). The 'copy' creates a single plan in memory with the appropriate name, and 'save' writes that plan out to a file.

Hopefully, it is not too onerous to add the wrapper where you require it after doing a copy/save... this is how I've been working with the plans that I've created.

_________________
Steve Shipway
UNIX Systems, ITSS, University of Auckland, NZ
Woe unto them that rise up early in the morning... -- Isaiah 5:11

Yes that was what I meant. No that's fine, to make the wrapper is no hassle. Thanks for the clarification.