| Cheshire Cat Computing http://steveshipway.org/forum/ |
|
| Version 1.7.0a released http://steveshipway.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=764 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | stevesh [ Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Version 1.7.0a released |
| Author: | OverHere [ Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I installed to 7a to Win 2000 sp 3. When I try to run NagEvLogCtrl.exe, I get a pop up error saying it cannot find msvcr70.dll. Can you include that and plop it into the c:\program files\monitoring directory? |
|
| Author: | OverHere [ Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
It has been a while since I've done this, but I _think_ that if you do a static link rather than a dynamic link, it may put everything into the .exe for you. It makes it a bit bigger, but I think, in the end, if solves these missing file problems. |
|
| Author: | stevesh [ Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
you are right about the staic vs dynamic linking, but there's a reason for the dynamic linking, and it's the huge size and memory footprint. It would be much easier if Microsoft just had their compiler TELL you which libraries it needs, but that would be too simple... I will add msvcr70 to the library, it already holds msvcr.dll but that is probably the v6.0 one. [Edit: this is now done in v1.7.0b] Steve |
|
| Author: | tonyk [ Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Version 1.7.0a released |
| Author: | tonyk [ Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Version 1.7.0a released |
| Author: | stevesh [ Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
| Author: | tonyk [ Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
| Author: | stevesh [ Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Event ID 0? This may be the problem, I have not seen an ID 0 event before, and didn't think they were possible (I have a UNIX background, not a Windows background). I will check the code to see if I am using any !=0 tests on the eventID. The logs show that the list is being parsed as 3 items, so it looks very much as if the initial 0 in the eventID list is being ignored by the code (I use atoi()). It may well be that I'm using >0 as a test for valid eventIDs in the parsed list... I dont have the code to hand now to check, though. Thanks for this detailed test output, it makes it much easier to spot things |
|
| Author: | stevesh [ Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
This was indeed the case -- the program ignores eventID 0 in the filters as it believes (as I previously thought) that eventIDs must be between 1 and 65535 inclusive. I will post a v1.7.2 shortly which allows EventIDs to be zero. Sorry for my mistake here... |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 12 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|